eplex® rp panel Search Results


eplex rp panel  (GenMark Diagnostics)
90
GenMark Diagnostics eplex rp panel
Characteristics of the Reports (N = 63) from the 56 Included Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
Eplex Rp Panel, supplied by GenMark Diagnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/eplex%C2%AE+rp+panel/eplex+rp+panel/pmc07108200-28-0-3
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eplex rp panel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Characteristics of the Reports (N = 63) from the 56 Included Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Journal: Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Article Title: Rapid Molecular Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Impact Studies

doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz056

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characteristics of the Reports (N = 63) from the 56 Included Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Article Snippet: ePlex RP Panel (GenMark Diagnostics) f , 1 (1.6).

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Virus, Luminex

Forest plot for sensitivity (left) and specificity (right) (% with 95% confidence interval) of all study reports (N = 63), stratified and pooled per assay (top to bottom). In one study (Salez 2012), no negative tested samples were included, so specificity could not be calculated for this study and was therefore excluded from the pooled analysis. For specificity, 4 studies had an outstandingly low specificity due to the case-control design with inclusion of a very low number of virus-negative patients: 37 negative patients, of whom 22 tested false positive with the Alere i Influenza A&B assay (Chapin 2015), 2 negative patients, of whom 1 tested false positive with FilmArray (Butt 2014), 3 negative patients, of whom 2 tested false positive with the Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus test (Butt 2014), and 29 negative patients, of whom 10 tested false positive with the ePlex RP panel (Nijhuis 2017). Please see for the reference list of studies. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Journal: Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Article Title: Rapid Molecular Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Impact Studies

doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz056

Figure Lengend Snippet: Forest plot for sensitivity (left) and specificity (right) (% with 95% confidence interval) of all study reports (N = 63), stratified and pooled per assay (top to bottom). In one study (Salez 2012), no negative tested samples were included, so specificity could not be calculated for this study and was therefore excluded from the pooled analysis. For specificity, 4 studies had an outstandingly low specificity due to the case-control design with inclusion of a very low number of virus-negative patients: 37 negative patients, of whom 22 tested false positive with the Alere i Influenza A&B assay (Chapin 2015), 2 negative patients, of whom 1 tested false positive with FilmArray (Butt 2014), 3 negative patients, of whom 2 tested false positive with the Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus test (Butt 2014), and 29 negative patients, of whom 10 tested false positive with the ePlex RP panel (Nijhuis 2017). Please see for the reference list of studies. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Article Snippet: ePlex RP Panel (GenMark Diagnostics) f , 1 (1.6).

Techniques: Control, Virus